Which statement about disguising explosives is supported by the material?

Which statement about disguising explosives is supported by the material?

• A. Hiding in baggage tags
• B. Using scent masking techniques
• C. Cannot be disguised
• D. Disguised by moulding and painting to resemble toys or food

Answer: (D)

In security screening, the important idea is that explosives can be concealed by changing their appearance to look like everyday objects. The material gives an example that fits this pattern: disguising explosives by molding and painting them to resemble toys or food. This is why the statement describing that kind of disguise is the supported one. It shows that concealment can hinge on making a threat look like something ordinary, which is exactly what screeners must be prepared to detect. The other options aren’t supported by the material because they either reference concealment methods not mentioned or claim disguises aren’t possible, which the material does not indicate.

In security screening, the important idea is that explosives can be concealed by changing their appearance to look like everyday objects. The material gives an example that fits this pattern: disguising explosives by molding and painting them to resemble toys or food. This is why the statement describing that kind of disguise is the supported one. It shows that concealment can hinge on making a threat look like something ordinary, which is exactly what screeners must be prepared to detect. The other options aren’t supported by the material because they either reference concealment methods not mentioned or claim disguises aren’t possible, which the material does not indicate.